If last night’s results have you feeling like the country slipped away, I get it. Remember, though, the biggest federal housing reform package in a generation passed this summer. Housing is one of the last fights in America that doesn’t split down party lines. And really, this is a state and local fight. We press on because the American Dream is worth it. Lemme explain.
Back in the spring, I told you about a man named Jake.
He’s 23. He welds at a fabrication shop in rural Colorado. He found an acre and a half on the edge of town, lined up a loan, and picked out a manufactured home. He came up $10,000 short. The land went to an older couple building their third house.
A big chunk of that gap came from one federal rule. Since 1974, Washington required every manufactured home to sit on a permanent steel chassis. That’s steel built for the highway, bolted under a house that was never going to move again.
Jake’s story has an update.
On July 11, the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act became law, and the chassis mandate is gone. It passed the Senate 85 to 5 and the House 358 to 32. A factory can now build a manufactured home with or without that steel frame. The chassis has been estimated to add $5,000 to $10,000 to every unit, so this one change alone could have closed most of Jake’s gap.
Washington almost never fixes anything. This time it did. That deserves a moment of genuine celebration.
So Jake should be getting his keys any day now, right?
No. And the reason why tells you almost everything about housing in this country.
52 years of welding steel under houses that never move
To understand how we got here, you have to know where these homes came from.
The manufactured home started life as a travel trailer. In the 1930s, ‘40s and ‘50s, Americans hitched them to cars and followed work. After the war, the trailers got wider and longer, and families started living in them full-time. By the 1960s, they were houses in every sense except the legal one.
When Congress wrote the first national building code for these homes in 1974, it kept the trailer’s DNA. By federal definition, a manufactured home had to be “built on a permanent chassis.” The frame that let a trailer roll down the highway became a permanent legal requirement, even for a home set on a foundation and never moved again.
Think about what that meant for half a century. Every year, factories welded tons of steel under houses that would make exactly one trip in their lives: from the factory to the lot. The buyer paid for that steel. The buyer was usually the person with the least money in the whole housing system.
Nobody designed that to hurt Jake. It was just a rule written for one era that outlived its reason by 50 years. That’s how most of the problems in housing happen.
So are we done?
Here’s the question nobody in Washington asks out loud. Who actually decides whether that house gets built?
DC? Not really.
Congress decides what the house is made of. Your state decides whether it can be sold, titled, and financed. And your county or city decides whether there’s a single piece of land where you’re allowed to put it.
That’s three layers of government. Congress just cleared one. Two are still standing.
Even the federal layer isn’t finished. HUD still has to write the construction standards for homes without a chassis before factories can ship them. That’s coming. But the real fight now moves to your state capitol and your town hall.
A deadline nobody is talking about
The new law put every state on the clock.
Soon, each state must certify to HUD that its laws treat a home without a chassis the same as one with a chassis. That covers title, financing, insurance, taxes, and installation. Most states have until July 11, 2027. States whose legislatures meet every other year get until July 11, 2028.
Why does that matter? Because plenty of states copied the old federal definition straight into their own law. “Built on a permanent chassis.” Word for word.
Texas has already rewritten its law to point to the new federal definition. North Carolina has moved too. But researchers at Pew who reviewed all 50 states found that nearly every state still has work to do.
And if a state misses the deadline? Homes without a chassis can’t be built, sold or installed there at all.
Congress opened the door. Your legislature can still lock it.
Why the slowest state sets the price for everyone
Now think like a business owner.
Your factory ships homes to six states. Three have updated their laws. Three haven’t. Do you run two product lines and two sets of inventory? Or do you keep welding steel onto every house, because that version sells everywhere?
Of course you keep the steel and pass the cost on. Anyone would.
So until the slowest state in a region acts, families in the fast states keep paying for a frame they don’t need. One legislature that can’t be bothered to change four words in its statute books raises the price of a starter home three states away.
That’s the hidden cost of doing nothing. It never shows up as a vote. It just shows up on the bill.
The real wall: lot size
Here’s the bigger question. Say every state gets it done tomorrow. Does Jake get his house?
Maybe not. The steel was never the only problem. Land-use rules are just as big, and probably bigger.
Builders go by a rule of thumb: the land should be about one-third of what the finished home sells for. A basic single-section manufactured home, installed, costs about $94,000. So the lot needs to cost about $47,000 for the project to pencil out.
Can you find land near jobs, with water and sewer, for $47,000? In some corners of America, sure. Around most of our growing metros, you can’t. And the reason isn’t that land is scarce. It’s that your town requires you to buy far more of it than you need.
How much more? Around Nashville, in neighborhoods that already have water and sewer, the typical rule requires more than half an acre per house.
Half an acre near a job for $47,000? It doesn’t exist.
So what does a builder do when the rules force him to buy that much land? He builds the biggest house he’s allowed to put on it. That’s the only way the numbers work. The starter home doesn’t get outcompeted. It gets outlawed before anyone draws a floor plan.
“Equal treatment” was supposed to fix this. It didn’t.
Some states saw the problem and tried to solve it by forcing towns to treat manufactured homes like any other house. No special bans, no special design rules.
Utah passed the strongest version in 1996. Washington followed in 2005. New York in 2015.
What happened? Nothing much. Hamilton tracked shipments in all three states and found no large or lasting jump in manufactured housing.
Why not? Because being treated the same as everyone else doesn’t help when everyone else is priced out too. Equal access to a half-acre minimum is equal access to nothing.
If your town has made the starter home illegal, it has made the manufactured home illegal too.
So we have overlapping governments, each doing its part to make ownership impossible for the people who need it most. Colorado isn’t special. This is the whole country.
Does it have to be this way?
No.
A 15-by-80-foot home fits on a lot 25 feet wide and 100 feet deep. That’s about a sixteenth of an acre, with a yard on every side. One ordinary quarter-acre lot becomes four homes.
Around Nashville, cutting the minimum lot to a sixteenth of an acre would expand the land where these homes make financial sense from under 1% of zoned land to almost 13%. That’s more than 16 times the room, and the only thing that changed was a number in a code book.
Now picture it the other way
Jake finds a lot on the edge of town. A sixteenth of an acre, water and sewer at the curb. A factory one state over builds his home without the steel he doesn’t need. A truck sets it on a foundation.
He’s paying a mortgage on something he owns. He’s building equity instead of paying someone else’s. He can have his parents over for dinner without asking a landlord.
Ten years later he wants to start a shop of his own in a bigger town. He sells his place, and now he’s got a down payment on a bigger house or a condo downtown. The first rung of the ladder did exactly what it was supposed to do.
That’s it. That’s the whole dream. All it takes is permission to build.
What you can do
A lot of people are concerned right now with the election results, but the power to change is still in the hands of the people in your state regardless of which party now holds the reigns of power. Congress did its part last year. For once, the stars lined up in Washington. Now the states and towns have to do theirs, and they’ll only move if someone asks.
Find out whether your state has updated its definition of a manufactured home. If the words “permanent chassis” are still in your statute, your legislature has until July 2027 (or 2028) to fix it.
Find out how much land your town requires for a single house. Look up the minimum lot size in your zoning code. If it’s a quarter acre or more, ask why.
Then ask your leaders why. Call your state legislator. Show up at your city council. Ask them to explain, out loud, why a man like Jake can’t buy a small house on a small lot.
Make them explain it.
The American Dream isn’t dead. It’s being blocked.
Build The Dream is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
